Case

819 F.2d 1002 Glaeser class action against Holland & Knight et al

In 1 on February 4, 2009 at 3:47 am

819 F.2d 1002
56 USLW 2013

Jean Ann CONE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Evelyn M. Glaeser, deceased, and as representative
of a class of all persons similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The STATE BAR OF FLORIDA, the Florida Bar Foundation, Inc., and Holland & Knight, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 85-3993. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

Ms. Glaeser, claiming to represent all persons similarly situated, sued Holland & Knight, the Florida Bar, and the Florida Bar Foundation, to recoup this interest. She claimed that the appropriation of the interest earned on her money constituted an uncompensated taking of private property in violation of the Fifth Amendment (as applied to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment), and deprivation of her property without due process, as well as a breach of fiduciary duty under state law. Her1 argument was simple: any interest earned on her portion of the Holland & Knight IOTA account belonged to her.

Posted via email from HKLaw Investigation

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: